The House version of the bill doesn’t provide unemployment benefits for individuals who don’t want to get vaccinated against the deadly disease, a key difference from the Senate version. The House passed a bill that would allow employees to claim an exemption on moral grounds, in addition to medical reasons or sincerely held religious beliefs. GOP leaders in advance of the special session prepared last-minute updates to proposed exemptions previously outlined during meetings of a special overreach committee. ![]() John Eplee, a Republican primary care physician from Atchison, says during debate Monday in the House that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective. It’s going to find vulnerable, unvaccinated and vaccine-vulnerable people.”Įplee said he wasn’t thrilled with the House bill but, in deference to some of those in the gallery, he explained that he would support the legislation - so long as it doesn’t change after negotiations with the Senate - because he believes in his constituents. It’s going to continue to percolate along. “This virus doesn’t care if you’re a Democrat or Republican, and this virus isn’t done with us. “Ladies and gentlemen, if you think we’re going to be done with the virus through this bill or through other things, you’re fooling yourself,” Eplee said. His little hospital is now filling up again with COVID-19 patients again, Eplee said, and every single one of them is unvaccinated. He dismissed frequently debunked misinformation based on unverified reports collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Environment. “There is no doubt in my mind as a practicing, living, breathing, primary care physician that this vaccine is incredibly safe and very prudent to give to our patients,” Eplee said.Įplee said he personally has ordered the vaccine for at least several hundred patients and has not seen any serious side effects. The House passed the bill by a 78-40 vote, setting up negotiations with the Senate to iron out differences in competing bills.Īnti-vaxxers packed the gallery overlooking the House chamber for this historic special session debate and were repeatedly admonished for jeering, applauding or coughing on the lawmakers below. ![]() Several other Republicans raised concerns about the safety and efficiency of the vaccine during debate over a bill expanding the ways workers can opt out of COVID-19 vaccine mandates and punishing businesses that question their beliefs. John Eplee, a Republican primary care physician from Atchison, shot down fears of the COVID-19 vaccine in a speech Monday on the House floor. ![]() “Even if this two year old could formulate such a belief, how would either of S.F.M.’s parents know this belief or make the statement that S.F.M.TOPEKA - Rep. “It is impossible for a two year old child to be ‘an adherent of a religious denomination’ if it means being a believer or being an advocate of a religious denomination’s anti-vaccination teaching,” according to the suit. “Terri has religious convictions and objections to vaccines using cell lines from tissue harvested from abortions.”Īccording to their suit, the Bakers maintain that the religious exemption language is vague, that it imposes an unconstitutional religious test, violates the Kansas Preservation of Religious Freedom Act, and as Linus Baker said, the wording of the law is just “nonsensical and ridiculous. ![]() “Part of that faith is having an understanding about vaccines and the risks they pose for children,” according to the suit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |